Steve Tobias ([info]nakedmen) wrote,
@ 2009-01-09 13:05:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
beating around the bush
People enjoy writing when it's convoluted, twists your mind around, uses words or phrases you don't entirely understand, or it seems intricate. I used to sort of write like that. That's writing without a point. When you're writing without a point then it has no essence. If you're writing with the point of looking good or intelligent or messing with people's heads just for the sake of doing so then after it's over what are you left with? Disappointment and the need to do it again. When you're writing with a point then your method is concentrated on accomplishing its goal, which means the writing is direct. When people can't understand what you're saying or have to continually look up words and ultimately are focused on the style more than the content then what's the purpose? It doesn't mean that writing shouldn't be an art, it means that people make it an art in the wrong place and time when it shouldn't be. Just get to the point, be direct, don't convolute meanings and twist words; with all the time you could spend on that you could spend it on analyzing the point you're trying to get across in the first place, which increases your understanding and allows you to say it in fewer words. Sorry but my beef lately is with people who act like they're intelligent when really they're not. I used to be one of them, now I just don't pretend because I know I'm an idiot. Whether you act intelligent or not it doesn't change your actual level, it only affects your ego, which affects your clarity of mind, which affects your intelligence. If an intelligent person can't figure that out then they aren't intelligent.

Beating around the bush is something I have no tolerance for lately. Part of that is my own lack of patience but part of it is practical too -- why don't people just get to the point? Life is so short and it's wasted on so much bullshit, dancing around issues, avoiding things, wallowing in guilt or stupid emotions. Have conviction, when you do something do it 100%, and if you aren't sure about it then make yourself sure about it or else don't do it. Everything I do is to the extreme and you know what? sometimes it's too intense, sometimes I look fucked up, but I don't care because I'll live by that philosophy. If you know a building is on fire then you focus 100% on getting out. If you aren't sure if it's on fire then you focus 100% on finding out, and when you find out you run out the door 100%, not half-way. You don't go into the main lobby, walk down the hall, out the door, and stop at the bushes. When my house is on fire I kick the bushes down.



(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]brucenstein
2009-01-09 07:38 pm UTC (link)
Whether you act intelligent or not it doesn't change your actual level, it only affects your ego, which affects your clarity of mind, which affects your intelligence.

= Own.

(Reply to this)


[info]0utre
2009-01-09 08:01 pm UTC (link)
I used to be one of them, now I just don't pretend because I know I'm an idiot.


Ahhh Steve, you are my hero. <3

Does this go for abstract art too? Where they say its a bowl of fruit and its just a few splashes of paint on a canvas? Or the guy that put 300lbs of sliced ham on a bed and called it art?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nakedmen
2009-01-09 08:48 pm UTC (link)
I don't know, I think if art is focused on style or method like with those examples then it's sort of a different thing, it could help people see things from a different perspective or look at things a certain way, so it could be beneficial. Whether the artist does it to look cool, or intelligent, or important or not is a different story. Sometimes a message is more effective if you use a different/new approach. Other times it's BS and saturated with personal/extraneous things and most people don't get the message. It depends I guess : )

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]brucenstein
2009-01-09 09:44 pm UTC (link)
This is the main quality I look for in art: intent.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nakedmen
2009-01-09 09:57 pm UTC (link)
If you mean the effect the artist is intending to create then I agree. But if intent was all that mattered then hospital workers would be better artists, which one could possibly argue they are, since "art" isn't really a solid term anyway. Sort of gets complicated : )

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]brucenstein
2009-01-09 10:10 pm UTC (link)
yeah, I was trying to keep it simple, hence saying "main" concern. Skill obviously is key as well, and I'm guessing is #2. Though, perhaps that's not the case. I just despise those artists who make art, like you say, simply for reasons other than making art. A white canvas is not deep or thought provoking, and selling it for $100,000 only makes you a douche.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nakedmen
2009-01-09 10:15 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I know what you mean. But who's crazier, the person who made it or the person who bought it? lol. Doesn't really matter to me, if it's crap then it's crap.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…